Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Sarvāstivāda response to the momentariness criticism—... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The Sarvāstivāda response to the momentariness criticism—that the activities of the four characteristics are sequential—itself undermines momentariness.

    CausationModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The Sarvāstivāda replies that the activities (kāritra) of the four characteristics of conditioned phenomena are sequential.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the activities are sequential, a single event undergoes four distinct phases within a given moment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An event that undergoes four sequential phases within a single moment infringes upon the indivisibility required by the doctrine of momentariness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityCausation

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    An event that undergoes four sequential phases within a single moment infringes ...If the activities are sequential, a single event undergoes four distinct phases ...The Sarvāstivāda replies that the activities (kāritra) of the four characteristi...

    Similar

    The Sarvāstivāda replies that the activities (kāritra) of the four cha...81%An event that undergoes four sequential phases within a single moment ...79%If the activities are sequential, a single event undergoes four distin...74%The objection to James's argument relies on the momentousness requirem...71%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: abhidharma
    View source passageHide passage
    The Sarvāstivādins (“advocates of the doctrine that all things exist”) were unique in their stance that the characteristics of conditioned phenomena exist separately as real entities within each moment. Their claim, then, is that all conditioned dharmas—whether past, present, or future—exist as real entities (dravyatas) within the span of any given moment. This induced a host of problems, one of which is that the Sarvāstivāda definition of a moment is difficult to reconcile with its conception a
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit