Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The Sarvāstivāda response to the momentariness criticism—that the activities of the four characteristics are sequential—itself undermines momentariness.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The Sarvāstivāda replies that the activities (kāritra) of the four characteristics of conditioned phenomena are sequential.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the activities are sequential, a single event undergoes four distinct phases within a given moment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An event that undergoes four sequential phases within a single moment infringes upon the indivisibility required by the doctrine of momentariness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.