The Scholastic Aristotelian framework treats qualitative properties (heat, wetness, color) as fundamental features of reality, a view Galileo and Descartes showed to be scientifically unproductive.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Scholastic(describes the philosophical tradition being discussed)
A style of philosophy developed in medieval Europe that tried to combine Christian theology with the logical methods of ancient Greek philosophers.
qualitative properties(Used here to clarify that 'occupying someone's qualitative role' involves matching all qualitative features, not just intrinsic ones)
Properties that include both intrinsic properties of an individual and extrinsic properties (such as relational or world-involving properties like being such that there are seven continents), which together suffice to fix the qualitative character of the world
scientifically unproductive(as a critique of the Scholastic approach)
A way of thinking about the world that doesn't actually help us make useful discoveries or explain how things really work in testable ways.