Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Scholastic perfection-transfer principle assumes a un... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The causal principles that everything must have a cause and that no effect can have perfections not in its cause are foundational and cannot be denied without rejecting that nothing can come from nothing

    The Scholastic perfection-transfer principle assumes a univocal relationship between cause and effect, but Aquinas himself acknowledged analogical predication, which severs the strict entailment that effects must share perfections with their causes.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Aquinas explicitly endorses analogical predication in Summa Theologiae I.13, distinguishing it from univocal predication.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If effects univocally shared all perfections with causes, God would possess finitude, potentiality, and materiality from creation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Analogical causation allows perfections to be present formally in God but only participated in creatures, resolving the univocity tension.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Aquinas's analogy of being still requires that causes genuinely produce perfections in effects, maintaining causal efficacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The claim conflates epistemological analogy (how we know perfections) with ontological causation (what causes produce in effects).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Medieval texts show Aquinas preserves the perfection-transfer principle even within analogical frameworks—analogy supplements rather than severs it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Aquinas
    Thomas Aquinas was a medieval Italian priest and philosopher (1225-1274) who became one of the most influential thinkers in Western history. He attempted to show that Christian faith and human reason are compatible, arguing that we can use logic and observation to understand God and the natural world. His ideas deeply shaped Catholic theology and continue to influence how religious and secular institutions think about ethics, knowledge, and the relationship between science and belief.
    Perfection-transfer principle(the main principle being analyzed in this statement)
    The idea that when something causes another thing to exist, it must pass along all of its good qualities or 'perfections' to what it creates.
    Scholastic(describes the philosophical tradition being discussed)
    A style of philosophy developed in medieval Europe that tried to combine Christian theology with the logical methods of ancient Greek philosophers.
    Univocal relationship(describes how the perfection-transfer principle assumes causes and effects are related)
    A connection between two things where a word means exactly the same thing in both cases—like how 'dog' means the same thing whether you're talking about a poodle or a golden retriever.
    analogical predication(Aquinas's theory for how positive terms like 'good' can be truly applied to God despite divine transcendence.)
    A mode of predication in which a term applied to God has a sense that is neither univocal with nor purely equivocal to its creaturely use; instead, the creaturely property preexists in God in a higher mode.
    cause and effect(Hume's three defining rules from Treatise of Human Nature 1.3.15.3–5)
    A relation requiring: contiguity in space and time, temporal priority of the cause over the effect, and constant union between cause and effect
    entailment(Conceptualist framework)
    Understood in terms of truth at a world
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedNatural Theology1 linked

    Related

    Analogical causation allows perfections to be present formally in God but only p...Aquinas explicitly endorses analogical predication in Summa Theologiae I.13, dis...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Aquinas's analogy of being still requires that causes genuinely produce perfecti...
    If effects univocally shared all perfections with causes, God would possess fini...
    +3 moreShow less
    Medieval texts show Aquinas preserves the perfection-transfer principle even wit...The causal principles that everything must have a cause and that no effect can h...The claim conflates epistemological analogy (how we know perfections) with ontol...