Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The causal principles that everything must have a cause a... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The causal principles that everything must have a cause and that no effect can have perfections not in its cause are foundational and cannot be denied without rejecting that nothing can come from nothing

    CausationNatural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Everything must have a cause or ground for its existence
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.No effect can have any perfection that is not also in its cause
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The principle that nothing can come from nothing is acknowledged even by atheists such as Lucretius
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Modern quantum mechanics provides empirically grounded cases of uncaused events at the subatomic level, such as radioactive decay, undermining the universal scope of the causal maxim.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The Scholastic perfection-transfer principle assumes a univocal relationship between cause and effect, but Aquinas himself acknowledged analogical predication, which severs the strict entailment that effects must share perfections with their causes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Lucretius invoked 'nothing from nothing' to deny divine creation entirely, meaning the principle is compatible with naturalism and does not uniquely support theistic causal claims.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Hume demonstrated in the Treatise that the causal maxim 'everything has a cause' is neither intuitively nor demonstrably certain, since we can conceive of an object beginning to exist without a cause without logical contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A principle that admits of conceivable exceptions cannot serve as a foundational, self-evident axiom upon which metaphysical systems of divine causation are built.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Natural TheologyCausation

    Key Terms

    Causal principles(foundational concept in the statement)
    Basic rules about cause and effect—the idea that things don't just happen randomly, but happen because something made them happen.
    Foundational(as the opposite of what cross-individual coordination is claimed to be)
    Serving as a basic starting point or fundamental building block from which other things are derived or built upon.
    cause(Philosophical definition of causation requiring both sufficiency and necessity of the cause relative to its effect)
    An event or state of things such that (a) if it happens or exists, the effect must happen or exist even if no further conditions are fulfilled, and (b) the effect cannot happen or exist unless the cause happens or exists.
    effect(Correlate of 'cause' in the defined causal relation)
    An event or state of things that is caused — it must occur if the cause occurs, and cannot occur unless the cause occurs.
    nothing can come from nothing(Acknowledged by atheists such as Lucretius; used by Clarke as a foundational premise)
    The general principle that no entity or property can arise without a prior cause or ground; the broader principle underlying the specific causal maxims
    perfections(metaphysics and philosophy of God)
    In philosophical theology, the supreme qualities or attributes (like knowledge, power, or goodness) that are thought to exist in God and can serve as models for understanding other things.

    Related

    A principle that admits of conceivable exceptions cannot serve as a foundational...Everything must have a cause or ground for its existenceHume demonstrated in the Treatise that the causal maxim 'everything has a cause'...Lucretius invoked 'nothing from nothing' to deny divine creation entirely, meani...
    +4 moreShow less
    Modern quantum mechanics provides empirically grounded cases of uncaused events ...No effect can have any perfection that is not also in its cause

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: hume-religion
    View source passageHide passage
    It is evident that the foundations of this argument rest with the related causal principles that everything must have a cause or ground for its existence and that no effect can have any perfection that is not also in its cause. To deny either of these causal principles is, on Clarke’s account, to reject the more general principle that “nothing can come from nothing” (a principle that the atheists such as Lucretius have themselves acknowledged). In the Treatise Hume develops an account of causati
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    The Scholastic perfection-transfer principle assumes a univocal relationship bet...
    The principle that nothing can come from nothing is acknowledged even by atheist...

    Similar

    The causal principle — that a cause must have at least as much formal ...87%The general causal principle holds that every event must have a cause.85%The Second Analogy establishes only the general principle of causality...84%If the general causal principle is true, then particular causal laws m...84%
    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit