Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The Scholastic tradition from Avicenna through Duns Scotu... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A transcendental is not necessarily common to many inferiors.

    The Scholastic tradition from Avicenna through Duns Scotus consistently treats transcendentals as maximally common, making commonality constitutive, not accidental, to their transcendental status.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Avicenna's doctrine that existence and essence are distinct in creatures requires a concept (being) that applies across all categories without limitation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Duns Scotus explicitly argues transcendentals like 'being' and 'one' cannot be genus or differentia, proving their status depends on maximal applicability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If transcendentals were accidentally common rather than essentially so, their universality would be contingent and fail to ground metaphysical necessity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Thomas Aquinas treats transcendentals as convertible with being yet maintains their commonality is analogical, not univocal, challenging strict constitutive readings.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Late medieval nominalists successfully questioned whether maximal commonality requires transcendental status, severing the claimed necessary connection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Avicenna
    Avicenna was a Persian philosopher and physician from around 1000 CE who became one of the most influential thinkers in history. He wrote extensively about logic, medicine, and metaphysics (the nature of reality), bridging Islamic and European thought during the Middle Ages. His medical encyclopedia was so respected that it remained the standard textbook in European universities for hundreds of years, and his philosophical ideas shaped how scholars in both the Islamic world and Europe understood knowledge and existence.
    Duns Scotus(as a historical figure mentioned in the statement)
    A Scottish Scholastic philosopher from the 13th-14th century who was famous for his very detailed logical arguments and his emphasis on the power of individual will.
    Maximally common(as describing the nature of transcendentals)
    Shared by the widest possible range of things; applying to everything without exception, rather than just some things.
    Scholastic tradition(as a philosophical school of thought)
    A style of medieval philosophy that emphasized logical reasoning, careful distinctions, and reconciling different texts and ideas—especially popular in universities and churches during the Middle Ages.
    Transcendental status(as the main point of debate in the statement)
    The position or rank of being a property that applies to everything and is fundamental to all existence, rather than being limited to certain categories of things.
    accidental(describing kinematic motion as non-essential)
    In philosophy, a property that something can gain or lose without changing what it fundamentally is (unlike essential properties that define the thing itself).
    constitutive(an alternative type of relationship the grounding relation might be)
    Describes how something is made up of or formed from basic components that define its essential nature.
    transcendentals(Philip the Chancellor's argument for the unity of intellect and will)
    Metaphysical properties (such as the true and the good) that are co-extensive across all being, differing only intensionally (in concept) but not extensionally (in reference)

    Connections

    2 topics

    Proof of definition segments1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    A transcendental is not necessarily common to many inferiors.Avicenna's doctrine that existence and essence are distinct in creatures require...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Duns Scotus explicitly argues transcendentals like 'being' and 'one' cannot be g...
    If transcendentals were accidentally common rather than essentially so, their un...
    +2 moreShow less
    Late medieval nominalists successfully questioned whether maximal commonality re...Thomas Aquinas treats transcendentals as convertible with being yet maintains th...