Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The single state epistemic model may be insufficient for ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The single state epistemic model may be insufficient for fully assessing the rationality of B's hypothetical choice at v2

    Skepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Assessing B's rationality at the counterfactual node v2 requires knowing what B believes A would do at v3
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The single state epistemic model may not include enough information about B's beliefs regarding A's counterfactual choice at v3
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Assessing B's rationality at the counterfactual node v2 requires knowing what B ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    The single state epistemic model may not include enough information about B's be...

    Similar

    The single state epistemic model may not include enough information ab...86%The epistemic model has a single state w where the strategy profile σ(...80%The single-state epistemic-probability model assigning profile (u, l) ...80%B is trivially materially rational at the single state w, regardless o...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: epistemic-game
    View source passageHide passage
    Recall that a strategy for a player \(i\) specifies choices at all decision nodes for \(i\), even those nodes that are impossible to reach given earlier moves prescribed by the strategy. Thus, strategies include “counterfactual” information about what players would do if they were given a chance to move at each of their decision nodes. In the single state epistemic model, \(B\) knows that \(A\) is following the strategy \(O_1I_3\). This means that \(B\) knows two things about \(A\)’s choice beha
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit