Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The single state epistemic model may not include enough i... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The single state epistemic model may be insufficient for fully assessing the rationality of B's hypothetical choice at v2

    The single state epistemic model may not include enough information about B's beliefs regarding A's counterfactual choice at v3

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Assessing B's rationality at the counterfactual node v2 requires knowing what B ...The single state epistemic model may be insufficient for fully assessing the rat...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The single state epistemic model may be insufficient for fully assessi...86%The epistemic model has a single state w where the strategy profile σ(...79%Players may not know the true state of their epistemic model.78%The single-state epistemic-probability model assigning profile (u, l) ...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: epistemic-game
    View source passageHide passage
    Recall that a strategy for a player \(i\) specifies choices at all decision nodes for \(i\), even those nodes that are impossible to reach given earlier moves prescribed by the strategy. Thus, strategies include “counterfactual” information about what players would do if they were given a chance to move at each of their decision nodes. In the single state epistemic model, \(B\) knows that \(A\) is following the strategy \(O_1I_3\). This means that \(B\) knows two things about \(A\)’s choice beha

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective