Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The skeptic cannot intelligibly raise doubts about the principle of non-contradiction, because accepting the principle of non-contradiction is a necessary condition for having meaningful thought at all.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Acceptance of the principle of non-contradiction is a necessary condition for meaningful thought and expression.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The skeptic's doubt about the principle of non-contradiction must be meaningfully stated to be a genuine doubt.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, the skeptic's doubt cannot be intelligibly stated or expressed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.