Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The Socratic identification of virtue with knowledge alone is insufficient once the soul is understood to have non-rational parts.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Socratic intellectualism holds that virtue just is knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Subdividing the soul reveals that non-rational parts can motivate action independently of knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Non-rational parts must be habituated separately, since they cannot grasp knowledge directly.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Show 1 more premise
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Browse more in Virtue Ethics
Related propositions within the same area of thought.