Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The sovereign lacks the right to fully control individuals' beliefs

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Sovereignty derives from the rational consent of individuals to establish order, not merely from the raw capacity to coerce (Rousseau, Social Contract).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A legitimate sovereign may rightfully shape the epistemic environment—education, public discourse, civic religion—to cultivate beliefs necessary for social cohesion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Controlling the conditions that form beliefs is functionally equivalent to controlling beliefs, granting the sovereign effective right over the domain of opinion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Hobbes argues that in the state of nature, unrestricted private judgment over good and evil is itself a primary cause of conflict and insecurity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.By contracting into civil society, individuals surrender private judgment—including on matters of doctrine—to the sovereign as the price of peace.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, the sovereign's right to regulate public belief-expression is not contingent on the impossible task of inner compulsion but on the legitimate suppression of destabilizing public opinion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.It is strictly impossible to completely control another person's beliefs
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Right is coextensive with power — one only has a right to do what one has the power to do
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Lacking the power to completely control beliefs entails lacking the right to do so
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.