Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The state has a legitimate interest in regulating matters... — Carmelics
    Home/Democracy & Governance
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→When an individual's private activities cause harm to others, the state may be justified in regulating those activities.

    The state has a legitimate interest in regulating matters of public concern.

    Democracy & GovernanceSocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Democracy & GovernanceSocial Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Democracy & Governance
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Activities that harm others are no longer merely private matters but of legitima...When an individual's private activities cause harm to others, the state may be j...

    Similar

    No state possesses legitimate political authority over the individual.77%When an individual's private activities cause harm to others, the stat...77%Harms to others give the state legitimate grounds for intervention.75%The state is guided by the common interest of the rich and propertied.74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: pornography-censorship
    View source passageHide passage
    Liberal defenders of the right to pornography may thus allow that restrictions on its public display may be justified. But only if pornography can reliably be shown to cause significant harm to people other than those consenting adults involved in its production and consumption will there be a legitimate case for prohibiting its voluntary private consumption. When an individual’s private activities cause harm to others, they become no longer merely a private matter but of legitimate public inter

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective