Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The suggestion that what matters is pain or suffering as ... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Punishment should not be understood as intended to inflict pain or suffering.

    The suggestion that what matters is pain or suffering as such invites the criticism that neither we nor the state should be in the business of trying to inflict pain or suffering on people.

    Justice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & Punishment

    Key Terms

    Inflict(as used in discussions of harm and punishment)
    To deliberately cause something harmful or painful to happen to someone.
    Invites the criticism(as used in philosophical argumentation)
    Opens up a suggestion or idea to objections and counterarguments.
    Suffering as such(as used in ethics and philosophy of pain)
    Pain or hardship in itself, considered as the most important thing to think about, rather than other factors like fairness or freedom.
    the state

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (Contrasted with Aristotle's view of the state as a natural stage of human development)
    A self-imposed moral entity created by humans at the command of natural law as a defensive cooperative scheme against the threat posed by other human beings.

    Related

    Punishment should not be understood as intended to inflict pain or suffering.

    Similar

    Saying punishment is intended to inflict pain or suffering suggests th...83%Punishment should not be understood as intended to inflict pain or suf...78%Non-deserved suffering is inherently bad, but deserved suffering shoul...76%Legal punishment raises distinctive issues about the role of the state...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: legal-punishment
    View source passageHide passage
    First, punishment involves material impositions or exactions that are in themselves typically unwelcome: they deprive people of things that they value (liberty, money, time); they require people to do things that they would not normally want to do or do voluntarily (to spend time on unpaid community labour, to report to a probation officer regularly, to undertake demanding programmes of various kinds). What distinguishes punishment from other kinds of coercive imposition, such as taxation, is that punishment is precisely intended to …: but to what? Some would say that punishment is intended to...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective