The supportingargument illicitly assumes a one-way dependence from choice to prophecy, ignoring the possibility that divine speech and human action are mutually conditioning within a single providential structure.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
One-way dependence(describes the direction of dependence between particulars and Forms)
A relationship where one thing (particulars) needs or relies on another thing (Forms) to exist or have meaning, but that other thing does not need the first thing in return.
Prophecy(Kaspi's view)
A form of knowledge of the future based on deductive inference grounded in acquaintance with the world and natural causality, rather than a super-rational phenomenon
Providential structure(the larger framework within which choice and prophecy interact)
A system or plan, usually understood as divine or fate-based, where everything is connected and organized by some higher power or purpose.