The supporting argument's premise that realized knowledge requires a structurally identical relatum presupposes a robust, enduring thinker that Humean skepticism explicitly denies.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Enduring(as describing the persistence of personal substance): Lasting or continuing to exist over time without disappearing or fundamentally changing.
Humean skepticism(as used in epistemology and metaphysics): A philosophical position inspired by David Hume, an 18th-century Scottish philosopher, who argued that we cannot find a permanent, unchanging 'self'—instead, we're just a collection of fleeting thoughts and experiences.
Premise: A premise is a statement or fact that you assume to be true as a starting point for reasoning or making an argument. Think of it as the foundation or building block you use to reach a conclusion—for example, "All dogs are animals" and "My pet is a dog" are premises that lead to the conclusion "My pet is an animal." Premises are essentially the evidence or claims you offer before drawing a final conclusion.
Presupposes(as describing what Plantinga's argument takes for granted): Assumes something to be true without proving it—like how an argument might presuppose that logic works, without first arguing that logic is valid.

Based on where you are in your exploration