The supposed absurdity of A=B dissolves once we reject haecceitism: within a purely qualitative ontology, 'two' indiscernible spheres is not a coherent description of one possible world but a notational artifact of an illegitimately enriched modal framework.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
A theory about what exists based only on observable properties and qualities (like color, shape, or texture) rather than on invisible identity markers.
indiscernible(as used in logic and metaphysics)
Unable to be distinguished or told apart from each other, even in principle. If two things are indiscernible, there's no way to tell them apart.