Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The trace — defined as minimal repeatability — is constit... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The trace — defined as minimal repeatability — is constitutive of the moment of hearing-oneself-speak.

    Consciousness & MindPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The hiatus that differentiates the subject into speaker and hearer defines the trace as a minimal repeatability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.This hiatus is found in the very moment of hearing-oneself-speak.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore the trace is not external or secondary to self-presence but inhabits its very moment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Husserlian phenomenology holds that the living present is a self-enclosed temporality that constitutes meaning prior to any iteration or repetition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If self-presence is constituted by retention and protention within immanent time-consciousness, no external hiatus or trace is required for hearing-oneself-speak.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore the 'minimal repeatability' Derrida identifies is a condition of signification, not of the pre-linguistic moment of inner speech itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Gareth Evans and Tyler Burge establish that self-knowledge through inner speech is immune to error through misidentification, implying a non-iterative, direct self-relation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the subject's self-acquaintance in inner speech is epistemically immediate and non-inferential, the interposition of a differential trace introduces a relational structure the phenomenology does not support.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageConsciousness & Mind

    Related

    Gareth Evans and Tyler Burge establish that self-knowledge through inner speech ...Husserlian phenomenology holds that the living present is a self-enclosed tempor...If self-presence is constituted by retention and protention within immanent time...If the subject's self-acquaintance in inner speech is epistemically immediate an...
    +4 moreShow less
    The hiatus that differentiates the subject into speaker and hearer defines the t...Therefore the 'minimal repeatability' Derrida identifies is a condition of signi...Therefore the trace is not external or secondary to self-presence but inhabits i...This hiatus is found in the very moment of hearing-oneself-speak.

    Similar

    The trace is the minimal repeatability found in every experience.90%The hiatus that differentiates the subject into speaker and hearer def...85%The trace is a form of proto-linguisticality (arche-writing), since la...82%Therefore the trace and language share the same minimal structure of r...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: derrida
    View source passageHide passage
    More specifically, Derrida argues that, when Husserl describes lived-experience (Erlebnis), even absolute subjectivity, he is speaking of an interior monologue, auto-affection as hearing-oneself-speak. According to Derrida, hearing-oneself-speak is, for Husserl, “an auto-affection of an absolutely unique type” (Voice and Phenomenon, p. 67). It is unique because there seems to be no external detour from the hearing to the speaking; in hearing-oneself-speak there is self-proximity. It seems theref
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit