Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The trace — defined as minimal repeatability — is constitutive of the moment of hearing-oneself-speak.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Husserlian phenomenology holds that the living present is a self-enclosed temporality that constitutes meaning prior to any iteration or repetition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If self-presence is constituted by retention and protention within immanent time-consciousness, no external hiatus or trace is required for hearing-oneself-speak.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore the 'minimal repeatability' Derrida identifies is a condition of signification, not of the pre-linguistic moment of inner speech itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Gareth Evans and Tyler Burge establish that self-knowledge through inner speech is immune to error through misidentification, implying a non-iterative, direct self-relation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the subject's self-acquaintance in inner speech is epistemically immediate and non-inferential, the interposition of a differential trace introduces a relational structure the phenomenology does not support.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The hiatus that differentiates the subject into speaker and hearer defines the trace as a minimal repeatability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.This hiatus is found in the very moment of hearing-oneself-speak.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore the trace is not external or secondary to self-presence but inhabits its very moment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.