Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Tractatus view that atomic propositions are logically... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The Tractatus view that atomic propositions are logically independent faces difficulties.

    Modality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.On the Tractatus view, unanalyzable (atomic) propositions should be logically independent and thus mutually compatible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.'This is red' and 'This is yellow' appear to be simple propositions, yet 'This is red, so this is not yellow' seems inferentially impeccable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.No one has provided a plausible analysis reconciling this apparent incompatibility with the independence thesis.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    'This is red' and 'This is yellow' appear to be simple propositions, yet 'This i...No one has provided a plausible analysis reconciling this apparent incompatibili...On the Tractatus view, unanalyzable (atomic) propositions should be logically in...

    Similar

    On the Tractatus view, unanalyzable (atomic) propositions should be lo...88%Two atomic propositions can be mutually inconsistent.83%If two atomic propositions can be inconsistent, there are necessities ...83%It is not impossible that actual analysis could discover atomic propos...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: logical-form
    View source passageHide passage
    This invited the thought that other philosophical puzzles might dissolve if we properly understood the logical forms of our claims. Ludwig Wittgenstein argued, in his influential Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, that: (i) the very possibility of meaningful sentences, which can be true or false depending on how the world is, requires propositions with structures of the sort that Frege and Russell were getting at; (ii) all propositions are logical compounds of—and thus analyzable into—atomic prop
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit