Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The view that God has both a timeless phase and a tempora... — Carmelics
    Home/Afterlife & Death
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The view that God has both a timeless phase and a temporal phase is logically incoherent.

    Afterlife & Death
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    2 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Any coherent description of God requires a single unified mode of existence, since a being with ontologically distinct phases is composed and therefore not absolutely simple.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Divine simplicity, defended by Aquinas in Summa Theologiae I.3, entails that God has no real internal distinctions between phases, properties, or temporal stages.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A being with both a timeless phase and a temporal phase violates divine simplicity by introducing real composition into God's nature, generating incoherence on classical theism's own terms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Transition between any two modes of existence—timeless to temporal—requires a cause or mechanism, but for God no external cause exists and no internal cause is possible without prior temporality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Garrett DeWeese and William Lane Craig's debate on 'timeless-then-temporal' God shows that the transition point itself must be located either in time or outside it, and neither option is coherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If the transition is in time, God was already temporal before creation; if outside time, the transition is causally unintelligible, so either way the two-phase model is logically unstable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.On such a view, there seem to be two phases of God's life: a timeless phase and a temporal phase.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The timeless phase seems to have existed earlier than the temporal phase.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.To stand in a relation of 'earlier than' is by all accounts to be temporal.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Topics

    Afterlife & Death

    Related

    A being with both a timeless phase and a temporal phase violates divine simplici...Any coherent description of God requires a single unified mode of existence, sin...But the timeless phase is supposed to be non-temporal, so it cannot stand in a r...Divine simplicity, defended by Aquinas in Summa Theologiae I.3, entails that God...
    +6 moreShow less
    Garrett DeWeese and William Lane Craig's debate on 'timeless-then-temporal' God ...If the transition is in time, God was already temporal before creation; if outsi...On such a view, there seem to be two phases of God's life: a timeless phase and ...The timeless phase seems to have existed earlier than the temporal phase.To stand in a relation of 'earlier than' is by all accounts to be temporal.Transition between any two modes of existence—timeless to temporal—requires a ca...

    Similar

    The timeless phase seems to have existed earlier than the temporal pha...87%On such a view, there seem to be two phases of God's life: a timeless ...86%But the timeless phase is supposed to be non-temporal, so it cannot st...84%God is temporal after creation, even if God was timeless before creati...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: eternity
    View source passageHide passage
    [O]n such a view, there seem to be two phases of God’s life, a timeless phase and a temporal phase, and the timeless phase seems to have existed earlier than the temporal phase. But this is logically incoherent, since to stand in a relation of earlier than is by all accounts to be temporal. (Craig 2000: 32)

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (2 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit