Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The wife voluntarily stabbed her husband after an unfores... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The proximate cause of the husband's death was the wife's voluntary act, not the act of giving her the knives.

    The wife voluntarily stabbed her husband after an unforeseeable psychological reaction to the gift.

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Related

    A voluntary act intervening in a causal chain breaks the chain of proximate caus...The gift of knives was only a distal necessary condition, not a proximate cause,...The proximate cause of the husband's death was the wife's voluntary act, not the...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The gift of knives was only a distal necessary condition, not a proxim...79%The proximate cause of the husband's death was the wife's voluntary ac...78%A coincidence (such as accidentally falling on the knives) intervenes ...69%If A were to not gamble at home, then A would kill someone at home.60%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: consequentialism
    View source passageHide passage
    One final solution to these epistemological problems deploys the legal notion of proximate cause. If consequentialists define consequences in terms of what is caused (unlike Sosa 1993), then which future events count as consequences is affected by which notion of causation is used to define consequences. Suppose I give a set of steak knives to a friend. Unforeseeably, when she opens my present, the decorative pattern on the knives somehow reminds her of something horrible that her husband did. T

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective