Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Zebra* case does satisfy condition (c*) because R is ... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The Zebra* case does satisfy condition (c*) because R is incompatible with a presupposition of the cognitive project of obtaining perceptual justification for P3

    PerceptionSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.R in Zebra* is the proposition that the animals in the pen are mules cleverly disguised to look like zebras
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.R entails that conditions are unsuitable for attaining perceptual justification for believing P3
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.R is therefore incompatible with a presupposition of the cognitive project of obtaining perceptual justification for P3
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismPerception

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Related

    R entails that conditions are unsuitable for attaining perceptual justification ...R in Zebra* is the proposition that the animals in the pen are mules cleverly di...R is therefore incompatible with a presupposition of the cognitive project of ob...

    Similar

    The Fox case does not satisfy condition (c*) because the truth of R do...94%R is therefore incompatible with a presupposition of the cognitive pro...84%R* is therefore incompatible with a presupposition of s's cognitive pr...83%If condition (iii+) cannot be satisfied no matter the epistemic circum...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: transmission-justification-warrant
    View source passageHide passage
    With (c*) in the place of (c), Fox no longer instantiates the disjunctive template. For the truth of R—the proposition that the animal in the garbage is not a fox—appears to jeopardize no presupposition of the cognitive project of obtaining a perceptual justification for P7. Thus (c*) is not fulfilled. On the other hand, arguments that intuitively do not transmit do satisfy (c*). Take again Zebra*. In that case R is the proposition that the animals in the pen are mules cleverly disguised so as t
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit