Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The Zebra* case does satisfy condition (c*) because R is incompatible with a presupposition of the cognitive project of obtaining perceptual justification for P3

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.R in Zebra* is the proposition that the animals in the pen are mules cleverly disguised to look like zebras
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.R entails that conditions are unsuitable for attaining perceptual justification for believing P3
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.R is therefore incompatible with a presupposition of the cognitive project of obtaining perceptual justification for P3
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42