Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    There are three types of use: use consequent upon civil o... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Evangelical use is a distinct third category of use that cannot be reduced to civil ownership or civil use

    There are three types of use: use consequent upon civil ownership, civil use without ownership, and evangelical use

    Justice & PunishmentProof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentProof of definition segments

    Connections

    4 topics

    Problem of Evil1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Rights & Liberty
    1 linked
    Philosophy of Language1 linked
    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Evangelical use is a distinct third category of use that cannot be reduced to ci...Evangelical use is the result of Christ's Incarnation, a separate salvific eventThe first two are natural results of the Fall

    Similar

    Civil ownership and civil use as legal categories are consequences of ...75%All civil dominium is based on the use of goods owned70%Civil ownership and civil use arose from man-made laws designed to reg...69%Wyclif defines civil dominium as proprietary lordship over goods of fo...68%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: wyclif-political
    View source passageHide passage
    Wyclif's definition of civil dominium as “proprietary lordship in a viator over the goods of fortune fully according to human law” is centered not on legislative authority, but on the private property ownership enjoyed by the viator, or wayfarer, along life's path (De Civili Dominio III ch. 11, p.178.9–17).[9] This is because all civil dominium is based on the use of goods owned, which is the basis for all postlapsarian conceptions of justice (recall that for Wyclif, only God truly owns create

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective