Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that There is no absolute truth as postulated by either dogmatism or skepticism.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Logical and mathematical truths (e.g., modus ponens, 2+2=4) hold necessarily across all possible experience, not merely present lived evidence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If truth were exhausted by present experiential evidence, the very premises used to argue against absolute truth could not themselves be stably true.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Peirce's pragmatist account grounds truth in the ideal limit of inquiry converging across all inquirers, not in any single subject's present experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A truth defined entirely by individual present revision cannot distinguish genuine correction from mere change, undermining the normative force of 'surpassing'.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Truth is defined as lived experience of truth — that is, evidence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Evidence is revealed exclusively in present experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Truth is always and exclusively tested in present experience, as one cannot relive the flux of experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.