Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    There is no genuine contradiction in the Extensional view... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    There is no genuine contradiction in the Extensional view of the specious present.

    Consciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The earlier and later contents of a single specious present need not occupy the durationless present moment (the interface between past and future).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The Extensional approach rejects the confinement of consciousness to momentary stream-phases.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.All contents of a specious present can be 'present' in the sense of possessing phenomenal presence (immediacy and vivacity characteristic of experiences as they occur) without being simultaneous.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & Possibility

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Consciousness & Mind

    Connections

    1 topic

    Perception4 linked

    Related

    All contents of a specious present can be 'present' in the sense of possessing p...Experiences at different times can each possess phenomenal presence, as evidence...The Extensional approach rejects the confinement of consciousness to momentary s...The earlier and later contents of a single specious present need not occupy the ...

    Similar

    The Extensional specious present conforms fully to the Immediacy Thesi...83%We can clearly and distinctly perceive no contradiction in our idea of...79%There are no contradictory contingent facts or truths.78%God is really possible (i.e., God's existence involves no contradictio...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: consciousness-temporal
    View source passageHide passage
    There may seem to be a fundamental difficulty with supposing that our immediate experience extends through time in the way being envisaged. Since the successive contents contained within a specious present are experienced together, isn’t there is a sense in which both tones are present even though they are non-simultaneous? Recalling the Extensional Simultaneity Problem (from §3), this can easily seem absurd. If x and y are experienced together, and both x and y are present, how can x and y fail
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit