Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that There is no genuine contradiction in the Extensional view of the specious present.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The earlier and later contents of a single specious present need not occupy the durationless present moment (the interface between past and future).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The Extensional approach rejects the confinement of consciousness to momentary stream-phases.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.All contents of a specious present can be 'present' in the sense of possessing phenomenal presence (immediacy and vivacity characteristic of experiences as they occur) without being simultaneous.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.