Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that There is no natural law that distinguishes some events in nature as more natural than others.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Aristotelian natural teleology distinguishes events by whether they fulfill or frustrate a thing's essential nature (telos), grounding a real natural/unnatural distinction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If teleological natures are real features of entities (as Aquinas and neo-Aristotelians like Foot argue), then events contrary to those natures are objectively less natural.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Statistical normality within biological kinds (e.g., species-typical functioning) provides a naturalistic criterion distinguishing normal from pathological events, per Boorse's biostatistical theory.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A distinction grounded in objective species-typical function is a natural law distinction, not an arbitrary or theological one, falsifying the claim that no such law exists.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
All events occur within 'God or Nature.'
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
All events within 'God or Nature' are equally natural.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.