Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that There may be more than one God involved in the creation of the universe

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The principle of parsimony (Ockham's Razor) prohibits multiplying entities beyond necessity when a single cause suffices to explain the observed effect.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A single omnipotent creator is logically sufficient to account for the universe's existence, making plural creators an ontologically extravagant hypothesis.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Leibniz argued that God's sufficiency as a complete explanatory ground renders competing co-creators redundant within any adequate cosmological account.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The design argument's analogical inference is weakened, not strengthened, by extending the human artifact analogy to include collaborative creation, since the analogy already fails at the cosmic scale.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Philo's own concession in Hume's Dialogues is that weakening the analogy to admit multiple gods simultaneously undermines confidence in any theistic inference drawn from that analogy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An argument that proves too much—admitting polytheism, a finite god, or a morally imperfect creator—collapses into skepticism about all causal inferences regarding the universe's origin.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The analogy between the universe and human artifacts does not rule out multiple creators
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Human artifacts are often produced by multiple collaborators
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.We can only infer a cause proportioned to the observed effect
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.