Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore, adding the qualification 'qua appearances' add... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The qualification 'qua appearances' or 'considered with our epistemic conditions' is redundant (otiose) when describing objects under an epistemic condition.

    Therefore, adding the qualification 'qua appearances' adds no further content beyond saying the objects are spatial.

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    An object must satisfy (fall under) a representation if that representation is t...If space is an epistemic condition of outer objects for us, then objects we cogn...The qualification 'qua appearances' or 'considered with our epistemic conditions...

    Similar

    The qualification 'qua appearances' or 'considered with our epistemic ...85%We cannot talk about appearances without conceding the real existence ...75%We cannot talk about appearances without conceding the real existence ...75%According to Kant, objects in space are only appearances, which are ou...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kant-transcendental-idealism
    View source passageHide passage
    Robinson (1994) raises a quite general objection to Allison’s notion of an epistemic condition, namely, an object must satisfy (fall under) a representation if that representation is to constitute an epistemic condition for that object (Robinson 1994 is a response, mainly, to Allison 1983 and 1987). So in the claim that “objects qua appearances” or “objects considered with our epistemic conditions” the qualification “qua appearances” or “considered with our epistemic conditions” is otiose. If sp

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective