Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore formal identity cannot be stronger than essenti... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Formal identity is stronger than real (or essential) identity

    Therefore formal identity cannot be stronger than essential identity if the entailment relation runs only one way and essential identity is ontologically more fundamental.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If essential identity grounds formal identity but not vice versa, then essential identity determines what formal identity can be.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Ontological fundamentality means a property constrains what derivative properties can possess. Formal identity is thus constrained by essential identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.One-way entailment logically prevents the entailed property from being stronger than what entails it, since strength involves broader logical reach.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Formal identity (strict indistinguishability) may be logically stronger than essential identity even if the latter is ontologically fundamental.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Ontological fundamentality concerns causal/explanatory priority, not logical strength. These are distinct dimensions not reducible to each other.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.One-way entailment only guarantees the entailer is necessary for the entailed; it says nothing about comparative strength of the relata themselves.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linkedPersonal Identity1 linked

    Related

    Formal identity (strict indistinguishability) may be logically stronger than ess...Formal identity is stronger than real (or essential) identityIf essential identity grounds formal identity but not vice versa, then essential...One-way entailment logically prevents the entailed property from being stronger ...
    +3 moreShow less
    One-way entailment only guarantees the entailer is necessary for the entailed; i...Ontological fundamentality concerns causal/explanatory priority, not logical str...Ontological fundamentality means a property constrains what derivative propertie...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit