Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore the Pareto principle remains silent on most pol... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The Pareto principle is insufficient as the sole basis for welfare economics judgments in public policy contexts

    Therefore the Pareto principle remains silent on most policy questions

    ConsequentialismDemocracy & Governance
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    ConsequentialismDemocracy & Governance

    Related

    In the absence of interpersonal utility comparisons, the Pareto principle is the...Most public policy changes hurt some subgroups for the benefit of othersThe Pareto principle is insufficient as the sole basis for welfare economics jud...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The Pareto principle only approves changes that improve the situation of every m...

    Similar

    FEO as stated is silent about policy choices that produce divergent re...71%The Pareto principle is insufficient as the sole basis for welfare eco...70%Rawls provides no argument for why FEO should receive less priority th...69%Therefore, a principle that no one can reasonably reject is a principl...69%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: economic-justice
    View source passageHide passage
    The proponents of a “new” welfare economics (Hicks, Kaldor, Scitovsky) have distanced themselves from their predecessors (Marshall, Pigou, Lerner) by abandoning the idea of making social welfare judgments on the basis of interpersonal comparisons of utility. Their problem was then that in absence of any kind of interpersonal comparisons, the only principle on which to ground their judgments was the Pareto principle, according to which a situation is a global improvement if it is an improvement f

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective