Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    These philosophers have accepted (consciously or unconsci... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Contemporary philosophers associate moral responsibility with a unified moral self capable of controlling outcomes.

    These philosophers have accepted (consciously or unconsciously) the modern notion of moral responsibility.

    Moral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral Responsibility

    Related

    Contemporary philosophers associate moral responsibility with a unified moral se...Contemporary philosophers who write about collective responsibility place intent...The modern notion of moral responsibility is associated with a unified moral sel...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Many contemporary moral philosophers may prefer the Kantian notion of ...91%Contemporary philosophers associate moral responsibility with a unifie...87%The modern notion of moral responsibility is associated with a unified...86%Other notions of moral responsibility exist that do not conform to Kan...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: collective-responsibility
    View source passageHide passage
    Smiley (1992) argues that having an intention is neither equivalent to free will nor sufficient to ground the modern notion of moral responsibility (as distinct from its Aristotelian counterpart). Suffice it to point out here that contemporary philosophers who write about collective responsibility place intentionality at the center of their attention and because they have accepted (consciously or unconsciously) the modern notion of moral responsibility, they associate it with a unified moral sel

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective