Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    These unsuccessful theories were arrived at by applicatio... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→IWE (Inference to the Worst Explanation) is a reliable rule of inference

    These unsuccessful theories were arrived at by application of IWE

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Notable Defenders

    Boydcontemporary

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    IWE (Inference to the Worst Explanation) is a reliable rule of inference
    IWE sanctions inferring to the worst explanation of the available data
    Scientific theories tend to be hugely unsuccessful
    That IWE is a reliable rule of inference is the worst explanation of the fact th...

    Similar

    Scientific theories tend to be hugely unsuccessful87%Mathematics functioned alongside experience and experimentation to pro...78%That IWE is a reliable rule of inference is the worst explanation of t...77%Moral theories cannot be tested and confirmed in the way that scientif...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: abduction
    View source passageHide passage
    Even if the use of abduction in Boyd’s argument might have led to the conclusion that abduction is not reliable, one may still have worries about the argument’s being rule-circular. For suppose that some scientific community relied not on abduction but on a rule that we may dub “Inference to the Worst Explanation” (IWE), a rule that sanctions inferring to the worst explanation of the available data. We may safely assume that the use of this rule mostly would lead to the adoption of very unsucces

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective