Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Things happen either by chance or for the sake of somethi... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Whatever happens always or for the most part must happen for the sake of something and must admit of a teleological cause.

    Things happen either by chance or for the sake of something (exhaustive and exclusive disjunction).

    CausationModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Natural Theology4 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Nature exhibits regularity, with parts of nature coming about in patterned and r...What happens always or for the most part happens in a patterned and predictable ...What happens in a patterned and predictable way cannot plausibly be due to chanc...Whatever happens always or for the most part must happen for the sake of somethi...

    Similar

    Aristotle's argument assumes an exhaustive and exclusive disjunction b...84%In a real (exclusive and exhaustive) disjunction, the affirmation of o...77%In an unreal (inclusive) disjunction, the negation of one disjunct imp...76%If one disjunct is affirmed, the exclusivity of the disjunction rules ...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aristotle
    View source passageHide passage
    In this argument Aristotle seems to introduce as a phainomenon that nature exhibits regularity, so that the parts of nature come about in patterned and regular ways. Thus, for instance, humans tend to have teeth arranged in a predictable sort of way, with incisors in the front and molars in the back. He then seems to contend, as an exhaustive and exclusive disjunction, that things happen either by chance or for the sake of something, only to suggest, finally, that what is ‘always or for the mo

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective