Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Third-party moral emotions like indignation are legitimat... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→One may legitimately resent (and hence consider forgiving) only wrongs done to oneself.

    Third-party moral emotions like indignation are legitimate responses to wrongs done to others, and forgiveness is the overcoming of such emotions.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Moral emotions evolved to enforce social cooperation; indignation in bystanders deters wrongdoing by imposing reputational costs on wrongdoers.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Third parties have standing to judge wrongs that violate shared moral norms, just as we condemn distant atrocities we didn't witness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Forgiveness requires overcoming reactive attitudes; genuine forgiveness means abandoning resentment, not merely suppressing it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Only victims have the moral authority to forgive; third-party indignation often reflects self-righteous performative emotion, not legitimate moral response.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Forgiveness needn't require overcoming indignation—one can rationally judge wrongs as serious while still supporting reconciliation and rehabilitation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Third-party emotional investment in others' wrongs can fuel cycles of collective punishment that exceed proportional justice or victim preferences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Forgiveness & Mercy1 linked

    Related

    Forgiveness needn't require overcoming indignation—one can rationally judge wron...Forgiveness requires overcoming reactive attitudes; genuine forgiveness means ab...Moral emotions evolved to enforce social cooperation; indignation in bystanders ...One may legitimately resent (and hence consider forgiving) only wrongs done to o...
    +3 moreShow less
    Only victims have the moral authority to forgive; third-party indignation often ...Third parties have standing to judge wrongs that violate shared moral norms, jus...Third-party emotional investment in others' wrongs can fuel cycles of collective...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit