Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    This capacity for commitment is non-propositional in natu... — Carmelics
    Home/Religious Experience
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Genuine intelligence and semantics require a non-propositional capacity for commitment in how one lives

    This capacity for commitment is non-propositional in nature and can be characterized as love

    Religious ExperienceVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Religious ExperienceVirtue Ethics

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Religious Experience
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Philosophy of Language
    2 linked

    Related

    Genuine intelligence and semantics presuppose the capacity for a kind of commitm...Genuine intelligence and semantics require a non-propositional capacity for comm...

    Similar

    The person who is disponible (open/receptive) experiences commitment f...75%Our normative commitments arise from how we must view ourselves as hav...75%The analogy between love and moral commitment does not establish that ...75%Moving beyond the aesthetic life requires making a commitment.74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: chinese-room
    View source passageHide passage
    John Haugeland (2002) argues that there is a sense in which a processor must intrinsically understand the commands in the programs it runs: it executes them in accord with the specifications. “The only way that we can make sense of a computer as executing a program is by understanding its processor as responding to the program prescriptions as meaningful” (385). Thus operation symbols have meaning to a system. Haugeland goes on to draw a distinction between narrow and wide system. He argues that

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective