Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    This entanglement with the relative would compromise the ... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→God must be libertarianly free in his production of creatures—free either to create or not to create.

    This entanglement with the relative would compromise the divine absoluteness.

    Divine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine Attributes

    Related

    But then God would not be absolute.God must be libertarianly free in his production of creatures—free either to cre...If God depends on the created world, he would need what is other than himself to...If God must create (i.e., the divine nature necessitates creation), then God wou...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    +2 more
    Show less
    If God's absoluteness is compromised, God would need the world as much as the wo...It is necessary to uphold the divine absoluteness.

    Similar

    The true absolute must embrace the relative rather than stand in oppos...77%If the absolute stood over against the relative, it would itself be de...76%If the relation of God (the absolute) to the world fell outside God, t...73%By analogy with entanglement, if a plurality of coexistent omnipotent ...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: divine-simplicity
    View source passageHide passage
    But to uphold the divine absoluteness, it is also necessary that God be libertarianly free in his production of creatures. He must be free either to create or not to create. For suppose that the divine nature is such that God must create. Then God would depend on the created world to be himself and to be fully actual. He would need what is other than himself to be himself. This entanglement with the relative would compromise the divine absoluteness. God would need the world as much as the world needs God. Each would require the other to be what it is. But then God would not be absolute (Dolez...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective