Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Thomas Aquinas argues in Summa Contra Gentiles III.144 th... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Lex Talionis supports ECT

    Thomas Aquinas argues in Summa Contra Gentiles III.144 that eternal punishment is just because mortal sin constitutes an irrevocable turning from an infinite good.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Rejecting infinite good warrants infinite consequence, since the offense's gravity matches the value of what is rejected.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Justice requires proportional punishment; finite temporal suffering inadequately expresses the seriousness of rejecting God.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If sinners eternally refuse reconciliation, eternal separation from God reflects their own irrevocable choice, not imposed cruelty.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Finite human acts cannot logically warrant infinite punishment; proportionality requires finite response to finite choice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Death ends human agency; post-mortem souls cannot make new choices, so 'irrevocable turning' conflates temporal decision with eternal fact.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Eternal punishment seems unjust if God foreknew rejection and created the soul anyway, making damnation predetermined rather than freely chosen.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 linked claim · 1 topic

    Eternal Conscious Torment1 linked
    Lex Talionis supports ECT

    Related

    Death ends human agency; post-mortem souls cannot make new choices, so 'irrevoca...Eternal punishment seems unjust if God foreknew rejection and created the soul a...Finite human acts cannot logically warrant infinite punishment; proportionality ...If sinners eternally refuse reconciliation, eternal separation from God reflects...
    +3 moreShow less
    Justice requires proportional punishment; finite temporal suffering inadequately...Lex Talionis supports ECTRejecting infinite good warrants infinite consequence, since the offense's gravi...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit