Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Transient or non-universal features of a kind cannot constitute the essence of that kind.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Biological species are constituted by population-level statistical norms rather than necessary and universal properties shared by all members.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Post-Darwinian essentialism (Sober, Hull) shows that evolutionary taxa lack intrinsic essences, yet species remain real, explanatory kinds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If natural kinds can be genuine without universal essences, transient or variable features may still ground kind membership.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Locke's nominal essence doctrine holds that our kind-concepts track clusters of co-occurring properties, not hidden real essences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If essences are epistemically constituted by reliably co-occurring features, historically contingent traits can legitimately define a kind for cognitive and practical purposes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.To know what a human being is, one must identify what makes a human being human, not features that are transient or fail to hold universally.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Aristotle's favored locution 'to ti ên einai' asks what it was for an instance of kind K to be an instance of kind K, presupposing a deep, non-transient answer.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.