Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Transient or non-universal features of a kind cannot cons... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Transient or non-universal features of a kind cannot constitute the essence of that kind.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.To know what a human being is, one must identify what makes a human being human, not features that are transient or fail to hold universally.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Aristotle's favored locution 'to ti ên einai' asks what it was for an instance of kind K to be an instance of kind K, presupposing a deep, non-transient answer.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Biological species are constituted by population-level statistical norms rather than necessary and universal properties shared by all members.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Post-Darwinian essentialism (Sober, Hull) shows that evolutionary taxa lack intrinsic essences, yet species remain real, explanatory kinds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If natural kinds can be genuine without universal essences, transient or variable features may still ground kind membership.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Locke's nominal essence doctrine holds that our kind-concepts track clusters of co-occurring properties, not hidden real essences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If essences are epistemically constituted by reliably co-occurring features, historically contingent traits can legitimately define a kind for cognitive and practical purposes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language2 linked

    Related

    Aristotle's favored locution 'to ti ên einai' asks what it was for an instance o...Biological species are constituted by population-level statistical norms rather ...If essences are epistemically constituted by reliably co-occurring features, his...If natural kinds can be genuine without universal essences, transient or variabl...
    +3 moreShow less
    Locke's nominal essence doctrine holds that our kind-concepts track clusters of ...Post-Darwinian essentialism (Sober, Hull) shows that evolutionary taxa lack intr...To know what a human being is, one must identify what makes a human being human,...

    Similar

    Universal features that do not run explanatorily deep are insufficient...85%Essence, for Aristotle, must not only be universal across the kind but...81%The essences of natural kinds need be neither intrinsic nor possessed ...81%Transgeneric terms do not signify a universal.81%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: aristotle
    View source passageHide passage
    Aristotle’s commitment to essentialism runs deep. He relies upon a host of loosely related locutions when discussing the essences of things, and these give some clue to his general orientation. Among the locutions one finds rendered as essence in contemporary translations of Aristotle into English are: (i) to ti esti (the what it is); (ii) to einai (being); (iii) ousia (being); (iv) hoper esti (precisely what something is) and, most importantly, (v) to ti ên einai (the what it was to be) (APo
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit