Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Trinitarian problems of self-consistency vanish.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Relative identity (Geach) requires a sortal concept under which items are identical, but 'God' and 'person' yield contradictory identity facts for the same pairs.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If the Father is the same God as the Son but not the same person, transitivity of identity is violated, not dissolved by concept-relativity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Frege's context principle governs number ascriptions to concepts, not identity statements between individual substances in classical theology.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Trinitarian doctrine as formulated at Nicaea and Chalcedon explicitly commits to numerical oneness of substance, which resists Fregean relativization.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The Trinity is just an ordinary case of one-many identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Number-properties are concept-relative (following Frege).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.