Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Two organisms can be intrinsic duplicates yet belong to d... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Species are not natural kinds, or the view that kindhood is fixed by intrinsic properties must be revised

    Two organisms can be intrinsic duplicates yet belong to different species if their lineages diverged, as Kripke's modal argument about origin implies historical facts are essential.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kripke's rigid designators framework shows that origin facts determine identity across possible worlds, not just intrinsic properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Species membership is determined by reproductive lineage and genealogical history, not phenotypic or genetic similarity alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Intrinsic duplicates with different ancestries have different causal histories, making them distinct biological kinds despite physical identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If species identity depends on historical facts rather than intrinsic traits, we cannot identify species membership from organisms alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kripke's modal arguments concern logical possibility and necessity, not metaphysical facts about actual biological classification systems.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Reproductive isolation and ecological niche—intrinsic functional properties—better explain species distinctions than inaccessible historical facts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Diverged(describing how evolutionary paths separate)
    Separated and went in different directions; in evolution, when two populations split apart and stop interbreeding.
    Essential(describes what separation and unity would need to be)
    Absolutely necessary or fundamental—something that must be present for something else to exist or work.
    Intrinsic duplicates(describing organisms that look and function identically)
    Two things that are completely identical in all their internal properties and features, like two copies of the exact same object.
    Kripke
    Kripke refers to Saul Kripke, an influential American philosopher and logician known for revolutionizing how we think about names, meaning, and possibility. He argued that names like "Albert Einstein" refer directly to the actual person rather than through descriptions of their properties, which changed philosophy fundamentally. His work also introduced "possible worlds" as a way to understand concepts like necessity and possibility, making him one of the most important philosophers of the 20th century.
    Lineages(evolutionary biology)
    Family lines of organisms descended from a common ancestor, stretching back through evolutionary history.
    modal argument(Kripke's critique of Fregean descriptivism in Naming and Necessity)
    An argument against Fregean descriptivism that uses considerations about necessity and possibility to show that names and their associated descriptions differ in modal behavior
    species(Bacon's multiplicatio specierum theory adapted to epistemology by Crathorn)
    A representative likeness of an external thing, transmitted causally through a medium; in Crathorn's usage, a material mental quality in the mind that has the same nature as the external thing it represents.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    If species identity depends on historical facts rather than intrinsic traits, we...Intrinsic duplicates with different ancestries have different causal histories, ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Kripke's modal arguments concern logical possibility and necessity, not metaphys...
    Kripke's rigid designators framework shows that origin facts determine identity ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Reproductive isolation and ecological niche—intrinsic functional properties—bett...Species are not natural kinds, or the view that kindhood is fixed by intrinsic p...Species membership is determined by reproductive lineage and genealogical histor...