Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Two types of thought cannot be fundamentally distinguishe... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Aesthetic judgment is fundamentally different from color judgment.

    Two types of thought cannot be fundamentally distinguished by a grounding relation that both types equally presuppose.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If two thought-types both require the same grounding relation, that relation cannot be what differentiates them fundamentally.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Fundamental distinction requires asymmetry in their essential features; shared presuppositions create symmetry, not distinction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Empirically, attempts to ground analytical vs. synthetic thought, or intuition vs. reason, fail because both presuppose a common logical base.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Shared presuppositions need not eliminate fundamental differences—two animals both presuppose metabolism yet differ fundamentally in kind.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The claim conflates 'grounding relation' with 'differentiating feature'—thoughts could share grounding yet differ in processing or content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Many dichotomies (e.g., deductive vs. inductive) are fundamentally distinguished despite both presupposing logical inference as a shared base.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics1 linked

    Related

    Aesthetic judgment is fundamentally different from color judgment.Empirically, attempts to ground analytical vs. synthetic thought, or intuition v...Fundamental distinction requires asymmetry in their essential features; shared p...If two thought-types both require the same grounding relation, that relation can...
    +3 moreShow less
    Many dichotomies (e.g., deductive vs. inductive) are fundamentally distinguished...Shared presuppositions need not eliminate fundamental differences—two animals bo...The claim conflates 'grounding relation' with 'differentiating feature'—thoughts...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit