Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Understanding the linguistic meaning of an utterance is o... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Interpretation must supplement its focus on word-usage with attention to the author's psychology

    Understanding the linguistic meaning of an utterance is only a necessary, not sufficient, condition for understanding the utterance fully; one must also discover the author's illocutionary intentions

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    author's intention(in philosophy of language and interpretation)
    What the person speaking or writing actually meant to convey or accomplish, which may be different from what their words literally say.
    illocutionary intention(in philosophy of language)
    What the speaker actually *means* to accomplish or communicate by saying something, beyond just the literal words—for example, asking 'Can you close the door?' isn't really asking about ability, but requesting that someone close it.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    linguistic meaning(Contrasted with authorial intention and illocutionary force in hermeneutic theory)
    The semantic content of a word, formula, or utterance as determined by the rules governing its use within the background system of linguistic possibilities
    necessary condition(Counterfactual analysis of causation; Mackie 1965, 1974)
    A condition C is necessary for event E if E would not have occurred in the absence of C
    sufficient condition(Used in the context of whether intrinsic properties can define species membership)
    A property whose presence guarantees membership in or applicability of a category, such that having the property entails belonging to the species or class
    utterance(Contrast drawn in discussing the referent of demonstrative 'that')
    A concrete event (an utterance-token), as opposed to an abstract utterance-type.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedPerception1 linked

    Related

    A quasi-empiricist theory of concepts entails that understanding an author's con...An author often conveys ideas via the way parts are put together to form a textu...Interpretation must supplement its focus on word-usage with attention to the aut...The linguistic meaning of a formula is often ambiguous, and identifying the rele...
    +1 moreShow less
    When dealing with concepts distinctive to a particular author rather than common...

    Similar

    A speaker's intention must be regarded as having some evidential weigh...83%Legal interpretation should not automatically seek the speaker's commu...83%Synonymy and linguistic meaning cannot be given serious explanatory se...81%The meaning of a linguistic expression and what a speaker means by utt...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: herder
    View source passageHide passage
    In On Thomas Abbt’s Writings, On the Cognition and Sensation, and elsewhere Herder makes one of his most important and influential innovations: interpretation must supplement its focus on word-usage with attention to the author’s psychology. Herder implies several reasons for this (some of which would subsequently be developed more explicitly and elaborately by successors such as Schleiermacher and Friedrich Schlegel): (1) As was already mentioned, he embraces a quasi-empiricist theory of concep

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective