Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Vast numbers of celestial buddhas and bodhisattvas presently exist who have already reached attainment.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Beginningless time does not entail that any finite sequence of causes has had sufficient opportunity to reach completion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An infinite regress of prior conditions can perpetually defer attainment without ever actualizing it, as Kant's antinomies of pure reason demonstrate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Madhyamaka philosophy, particularly Candrakīrti's Prasannapadā, holds that ultimately no substantial, independently existing 'buddhas' can be posited as really present.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If celestial buddhas lack inherent existence from the perspective of ultimate truth, the claim that vast numbers 'presently exist' conflates conventional designation with ontological presence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Buddhahood is the supreme fulfillment available to all sentient beings since the beginningless past.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Many sentient beings have had sufficient time and opportunity to reach buddhahood across beginningless existence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42