Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Virtue alone, without external goods, is enough to secure... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Virtue is both necessary and sufficient for eudaimonia.

    Virtue alone, without external goods, is enough to secure eudaimonia.

    Virtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue Ethics

    Related

    Eudaimonia requires virtue.Virtue is both necessary and sufficient for eudaimonia.

    Similar

    Virtue alone is not sufficient for eudaimonia; external goods are also...89%

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Virtue is both necessary and sufficient for eudaimonia.83%
    Virtue is necessary for eudaimonia.82%
    External goods, which are a matter of luck, are required for eudaimoni...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ethics-virtue
    View source passageHide passage
    But although all standard versions of virtue ethics insist on that conceptual link between virtue and eudaimonia, further links are matters of dispute and generate different versions. For Aristotle, virtue is necessary but not sufficient—what is also needed are external goods which are a matter of luck. For Plato and the Stoics, virtue is both necessary and sufficient for eudaimonia (Annas 1993).

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective