Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that We cannot now do anything about the fact that God timelessly knows T.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Timeless knowledge, unlike the past, lacks the fixed causal-temporal location that grounds our inability to alter it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If God's timeless knowing is simultaneous with our acting, our free act may itself constitute part of what God timelessly knows.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The 'out of reach' analogy assumes temporal inaccessibility, but timelessness is not merely temporal distance from the present.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
On Ockhamist grounds, God's timeless belief about T is a 'soft fact' whose content is counterfactually dependent on what we freely do.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If what God timelessly knows is fixed only by what we do, then in doing otherwise we would have determined God to know otherwise, preserving freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The timeless realm is as much out of our reach as the past.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
We have no more reason to think we can do anything about God's timeless knowing than about God's past knowing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.