Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    What is constitutive of God's own nature cannot coherentl... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→God's freedom is not limited by the eternal truths or immutable essences God created.

    What is constitutive of God's own nature cannot coherently be described as freely willed by God without collapsing the distinction between God's nature and God's free acts.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Logical identity requires that X cannot both be constitutive of A's nature and be freely chosen by A without contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God freely willed His nature, His nature would be contingent on prior divine choices, making it derivative rather than foundational.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Collapsing the nature/acts distinction removes the conceptual ground for explaining why God's acts flow from His character necessarily.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.God's timelessness permits all divine acts—including those constituting His nature—to be eternally free without temporal priority problems.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The nature/acts distinction itself may be a creature-relative conceptual scheme inapplicable to a non-composite divine being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Self-constitution (God willing His own nature) coherently differs from external constitution, avoiding the stated incoherence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Collapsing the nature/acts distinction removes the conceptual ground for explain...God's freedom is not limited by the eternal truths or immutable essences God cre...God's timelessness permits all divine acts—including those constituting His natu...If God freely willed His nature, His nature would be contingent on prior divine ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Logical identity requires that X cannot both be constitutive of A's nature and b...Self-constitution (God willing His own nature) coherently differs from external ...The nature/acts distinction itself may be a creature-relative conceptual scheme ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit