Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that What is constitutive of God's own nature cannot coherently be described as freely willed by God without collapsing the distinction between God's nature and God's free acts.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.God's timelessness permits all divine acts—including those constituting His nature—to be eternally free without temporal priority problems.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The nature/acts distinction itself may be a creature-relative conceptual scheme inapplicable to a non-composite divine being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Self-constitution (God willing His own nature) coherently differs from external constitution, avoiding the stated incoherence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Logical identity requires that X cannot both be constitutive of A's nature and be freely chosen by A without contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God freely willed His nature, His nature would be contingent on prior divine choices, making it derivative rather than foundational.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Collapsing the nature/acts distinction removes the conceptual ground for explaining why God's acts flow from His character necessarily.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.